Suspending a warrant of possession
Following the issue of a warrant, a notice of eviction on Form N54 is sent or delivered from the court, stating a date and time when the bailiffs will evict the client from her/his property. The client can apply for a warrant of possession to be suspended at any time before the date and time specified on the warrant, although it is preferable to apply as early as possible.1For issues to consider when dealing with warrants of possession for rent arrears, see M Robinson, ‘Hard Times’, Adviser 149; see also J Luba and D Malone, ‘Staying, Suspending and Setting Aside Possession Warrants’, Legal Action, June 2012 Form N244 should be completed (see here), showing: •how the client’s circumstances have changed since the possession order was made;
•that the equity or rental revenue of the creditor is not threatened by a suspension;
•a well-supported offer of payment and a lump sum (or first payment), if possible;
•if the client does not wish to remain in the property, that arrangements are in hand for sale of the property or rehousing, but that this will take time.
Form N244 should be accompanied by a financial statement. A fee of £14 is payable.2Civil Proceedings Fees Order 2008 as amended by Court Fees (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order 2020, Fee 2.7. This fee is payable on an application ‘to vary a judgment or suspend enforcement, including suspending a warrant of possession’. See here for details on applying for full or partial fee remission. If possible, take the form to the court rather than posting it as there will be little time available. If the lender or landlord issued the possession action using the ’possession claim online’ process and the client wants to make her/his application online, any court fee must be paid either by debit card or credit card. The possession claim online website contains a list of organisations through which the client can claim full or partial fee remission online. Otherwise, Form N244 must be filed, and any application for fee remission must be made, in person.
A hearing is granted almost immediately and the client must attend. You should always try to negotiate directly with the creditor before the hearing and ensure that if an agreement has been reached, the details are communicated to the solicitor or agent who will be representing the creditor at the hearing. If possible, arrange for confirmation in writing so the client can take this to the hearing in case there is any dispute. If no agreement can be reached, the matter must be presented clearly before the district judge, using similar arguments to those covered on here. At the same time, it may be necessary to ask for the payment order to be varied (reduced) to a level the client can afford. In theory, there is no limit to the number of applications that can be made to suspend a warrant, but if the client persistently applies and then fails to make payments, the application may be refused and s/he may be told that s/he cannot make any further applications without leave of the court. In this case, assuming that the application is realistic, the client must ask for leave of the court to apply, on Form N244, before continuing on the same application to explain the reasons. The court usually considers granting leave to apply first. If granted, it then considers the application for suspension in the same hearing.
If the application is refused, the eviction usually takes place on the date and time on the warrant. The client may ask for a short suspension (eg, two weeks) to find alternative accommodation. Alternatively, in mortgage cases, if repossession is granted, the client could ask to stay in the property while the lender sells it.3Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Booker [1996] 29 HLR 634 After the execution of the warrant of possession (ie, the eviction), no order for its suspension can be made unless: •the possession order itself is set aside; or
•the warrant was obtained fraudulently; or
•there had been an abuse of the process or oppression in the execution of the warrant.4Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council v Hill, The Times, 25 April 1994; see also Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Obi [1994] 28 HLR 22 It appears that ’oppression’ is not limited to conduct by the creditor but can extend to conduct by the court – eg, misleading information from court staff on the procedure for suspending a warrant.5Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council v Lemeh [2001] 33 HLR 23 (Adviser 83 abstracts); Lambeth London Borough Council v Hughes [2000] All ER(D) 622 (Adviser 84 abstracts)