Adjournments
An adjournment is a court order to delay a hearing, either for a specified amount of time or indefinitely. The county court can either adjourn or bring forward the date of a hearing at any time. It can decide to do this itself or because one or both of the parties have applied.1r3.1(2)(b) CPR Alert: Since 19 March 2020, court staff may waive the application fee to adjourn a hearing because of the coronavirus outbreak. Ultimately, however, it is the judge who decides whether the hearing will be adjourned or can still go ahead.2Guidance is available at As one of the main aims of the Civil Procedure Rules is to avoid delays in hearing cases, it is important, if possible, to attend court to apply for an adjournment in case it is not granted.
An application for an adjournment on the grounds of illness should be accepted, provided it is supported by a sick note, unless there is evidence that the illness or medical evidence is not genuine. Similarly, if an important witness cannot be present, a district judge should adjourn a hearing.
It is reasonable to grant an adjournment if there would otherwise be a miscarriage of justice. For example, if a client comes to a court desk in a county court hearing centre at 10am to ask for representation at a possession hearing a quarter of an hour later, it should be argued that there are (or may be) legal points which the court must hear and which cannot be adequately presented without further preparation. However, there must be some explanation of why the client has left it until the last minute to obtain advice or representation.
It is not a sufficient reason to adjourn a hearing simply because one (or even both) of the parties is not yet ready. Judges are often impatient or suspicious of applications to adjourn which they believe are merely means to prolong an action in which they believe the creditor should succeed. On the other hand, if the need for the adjournment arises because the creditor (or its representative) has failed to supply information or documents reasonably required by the client in connection with her/his defence, the judge is more likely to grant the adjournment.
A district judge should consider the merits of an adjournment, whether or not one or both parties are requesting one. However, it is clearly much easier to get an adjournment if the creditor agrees, and it is always worth contacting the creditor or its representative before applying for one.