Challenging coerced debt
Some people may wish to challenge the liability of credit agreements they have been coerced into signing. This is not the right option for everyone and will depend on the client’s circumstances.
It can be very difficult to have coerced debt recognised by the courts and/or lenders, as they often assume that ‘couples’ are a financial unit. A client will usually be responsible for repaying the money owing on any credit agreements that are in their name.
There is no general exception for people who have experienced economic abuse and have been coerced into taking out credit.
However, there are some elements of law that may make it possible to challenge the liability for coerced debt in some cases.
•Consumer credit law: all organisations providing credit must follow consumer credit law. If they do not, a challenge could be made on this basis.
•Lender obligations: the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) requires all credit providers to treat customers fairly. Challenges can sometimes be made if a lender has not upheld these obligations. These include properly assessing that a customer can afford credit repayments and checking that the customer has not been forced into taking out credit.
•Contract law: a contract with a lender may be invalid in cases of economic duress, undue influence or misrepresentation.
•Fraud: challenges to the liability of a credit agreement can also be made if the credit was taken out in the client’s name without their knowledge. This is known as fraud, and it is a criminal offence. Laws exist to support people who have had credit fraudulently taken out in their name. Clients should report fraud to the lender and the police. It is possible to negotiate with creditors to achieve partial or total write-off and a credit repair where there is agreement that the debt has been obtained fraudulently.